skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 93187 Find in a Library
Title: Death-Qualified Jury and the Defense of Insanity
Journal: Law and Human Behavior  Volume:8  Issue:1/2  Dated:(June 1984)  Pages:81-93
Author(s): P C Ellsworth; R M Bukaty; C L Cowan; W C Thompson
Date Published: 1984
Page Count: 13
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The process of death qualification of a jury undermines one of the most important defenses available to the mentally ill: the insanity defense.
Abstract: Thirty-five adults eligible for jury duty in California were used to test the hypothesis that people who are excluded from serving on juries in capital cases because of their opposition to the death penalty tend to place a greater value on the preservation of due process guarantees than on efficient crime control, and therefore are more likely to accept an insanity defense in criminal cases than are people who are permitted to serve on capital juries. Subjects who had previously been classified as death qualified or excludable read four summaries of cases in which the defendant entered a plea of insanity, and made judgments of guilt or innocence. In the two cases involving nonorganic disorders (schizophrenia), death-qualified subjects were significantly more likely than excludable subjects to vote for a guilty verdict. In the two cases involving organic disorders (mental retardation and psychomotor epilepsy), no differences existed between the two groups. In addition, excludable subjects gave significantly higher estimates than death-qualified subjects of the proportion of defendants pleading insanity who 'really are' insane. A bibliography, one reference note, and a list of 17 references are included. (Author abstract modified)
Index Term(s): California; Capital punishment; Insanity defense; Juror characteristics; Jury decisionmaking; Jury selection
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=93187

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.