skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 93556 Find in a Library
Title: Sentencing the Mentally Ill (From Reform and Punishment, P 125-154, 1984, Michael Tonry and Franklin E Zimring, eds. - See NCJ-93553)
Author(s): N Morris
Date Published: 1983
Page Count: 30
Sponsoring Agency: University of Chicago Press
Chicago, IL 60637
Sale Source: University of Chicago Press
1427 East 60th Street
Chicago, IL 60637
United States of America
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Regarding the mentally ill offender, this essay proposes principles for when to mitigate punishment, when to aggravate punishment, and the proper limits of both.
Abstract: The discussion focuses on those adults who have been convicted of crime and come to be sentenced who sufficiently depart from the prevailing norms of mental balance and rational competence as to be 'mentally ill.' This condition may continue to affect their behavior and be relevant to present problems of determining the sentence to be imposed, apart from its modulation of their degree of guilt. Current legislation for sentencing the mentally ill contains specific provisions for increasing punishment (sexual psychopath laws and dangerous offender laws) and for decreasing punishment (legislatively defined mitigating circumstances). All recent sentencing statutes provide for judicial discretion in their application, and the mental illness of the convicted offender may be relevant to the exercise of that discretion. In sentencing the mentally ill offender, it is properly argued that this is a condition that reduces moral culpability, thus diminishing the sanction justly deserved for the crime. It is also properly argued that some mental illness may increase the dangerousness of an offender, warranting an increase or extension of punishment. The sentencing judge must determine whether a sentence is to be mitigated or aggravated because of the offender's mental illness. If the base expectancy rate for recidivism is shown by reliable evidence to be substantially higher than the base expectancy rate of another offender with an identical record and convicted of a similar crime (but who is not mentally ill), then the sentence should be on the high range for the crime at issue. Otherwise, the sentence should be in the low range. Footnotes and 25 references are listed.
Index Term(s): Dangerousness; Mentally ill offenders; Sentencing factors
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=93556

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.