skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 93758 Find in a Library
Title: Capital Punishment and Deterrence - Conflicting Evidence?
Journal: Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology  Volume:74  Issue:3  Dated:(Fall 1983)  Pages:927-942
Author(s): B Forst
Date Published: 1983
Page Count: 14
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study considers research that has produced contradictory evidence regarding the deterrence effectiveness of capital punishment.
Abstract: Until 1975, belief in the deterrent value of capital punishment had no authoritative empirical support. Then Isaac Ehrlich reported results of a complex econometric analysis of aggregate United States time-series data, indicating that capital punishment is an effective deterrent. Considerations of earlier studies provides support for the theory that deterrent effects can be more efficiently estimated from observations of temporal differences in the relevant variables in cross-sectional data. This procedure is applied to data from the cross-section of States for 1960 and 1970. The findings, as well as earlier ones by Passell, Sellin, Schuessler, Zeisel, and others indicate that capital punishment does not have a perceptible influence on the homicide rate. Even if some people are in fact deterred from committing murder by the prospect of being executed rather than subjected to a lengthy term of imprisonment, the available evidence suggests that as many people, and perhaps more, are provoked to commit murder by the existence of the death penalty. This may be due to the increased incentives to kill police and witnesses to avoid capture for capital crimes, a decreased tendency to convict persons for capital crimes, the attraction to capital crimes by those with suicidal tendencies, or the tendency of capital punishment to increase the acceptability of violence. The apparent conflict in evidence between the findings of Ehrlich and those reported in this study may be due to Ehrlich's strong a priori belief in the theory of deterrence; the availability of a variety of small, volatile data sets; and a larger variety of options for analyzing these data sets. In sum, while the deterrence theory may apply to most sanctions, the evidence indicates that the death penalty is an important exception, one for which other theories of behavior appear to be more applicable. Tabular data and 48 footnotes are provided.
Index Term(s): Capital punishment; Deterrence effectiveness
Note: *This document is currently unavailable from NCJRS.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.