skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 93771 Find in a Library
Title: Prisoner's Paradox - Forced Labor and Uncompensated Injuries
Journal: New England Journal on Criminal and Civil Confinement  Volume:10  Issue:1  Dated:(Winter 1984)  Pages:123-146
Author(s): J T Campbell
Date Published: 1984
Page Count: 24
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Establishing inmate worker-injury compensation programs would be consistent with the goals of rehabilitation and decreased recidivism and would improve working conditions within prisons denial of compensation contradicts the objectives of inmate labor and the theory supporting workers' compensation.
Abstract: Following a discussion of the objectives of workers' compensation acts and the events which led to their enactment, the article examines the evolution of prison labor and the theoretical basis for such labor. Next, the judicial and statutory reasons for denial of compensation to prisoners under existing workers' compensation acts are explored. A practical and theoretical justification for compensating work-injured inmates is presented, followed by an analysis of existing plans which provide inmates with compensation and suggestions on the manner in which inmates should be compensated for injuries sustained in the course of their work assignments. Denial of compensation to inmates injured while working in prison offers the disturbing result of not compensating one who may be forced to labor without choice as to working conditions, while persons receiving compensation in work outside of prison receive workers' compensation under the conditions of voluntary labor and choice of working conditions. The effects of a permanent disability are at least the same if not worse for prisoners as for free laborers. Denial of compensation to inmates does not conserve resources but merely allocates the costs to those who neither have control over the institution nor directly benefit from prison labor. Under the suggested program, only inmates who incur long-term or permanent disabilities would qualify for benefits after release, and benefits would be revoked if reincarceration occurred. Compensation would be limited to work-related injuries. Lost time should be compensable to maintain the status quo of the inmate, and the statutory percentage available to free laborers should be extended to inmates. A total of 168 footnotes are provided.
Index Term(s): Correctional industries; Federal workers' compensation laws; Inmates
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.