skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 093839     Find in a Library
  Title: Police Handgun Ammunition - Incapacitation Effects, Volume 1- Evaluation
  Document URL: PDF 
  Author(s): W J Bruchey ; D E Frank
  Corporate Author: US Dept of Commerce
National Bureau of Standards
Law Enforcement Standards Laboratory
United States of America

National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
  Date Published: 1983
  Page Count: 51
  Annotation: After a critique of theories used to rank bullet effectiveness prior to 1970, this first volume of a two-volume report discusses the development of new methods and theories and examines the ricochet potential/characteristics for handgun bullets.
  Abstract: The testing considered (1) the ability of the average police officer to deliver effective fire, (2) the relative effectiveness of hits at different locations and depths of penetration into a human target, (3) rapid incapacitation as the preferred effect (independent of eventual death), (4) the performance of bullets in a reproducible target medium (ordnance gelatin), and (5) a method to extend the ranking system to variations in cartridge loadings without an extensive new test program. The kinetic energy theory of Hatcher and the energy deposit theory of the U.S. Army and Dr. DeMaio were examined and found to be lacking, and a new measure of handgun bullet effectiveness against human targets was developed. The new measure, called the Relative Incapacitation Index (RII), is the product of the volume of the Maximum Temporary Cavity produced by the interaction of a projectile and the tissue simulant (gelatin) at a given depth and the average vulnerability to incapacitation at that depth summed together for the entire penetration depth of the bullet to a maximum depth of 22 cm. The study concludes that there is no ideal firearm system (weapon/ammunition) for all situations; each police department must evaluate its own special requirements and choose a defensive weapon system capable of meeting its needs; however, the study shows that for handguns in 9 mm/38-caliber to 45-caliber range, a deforming projectile, driven at a velocity above the minimum deformation velocity, and an RII between 10 and 30 is a reasonable goal for handgun ammunition for use against a normally dressed assailant in an urban environment. Appendixes contain references, tables of coefficients for the RII predictive equation, the Theoretical Cavity Model for nondeforming projectiles, and vulnerability studies. For the second volume, which presents experimental data, see NCJ 93840.
  Index Term(s): Police weapons ; Bullet hole identification ; Equipment evaluation
  Sponsoring Agency: US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
United States of America
  Sale Source: Superintendent of Documents, GPO
Washington, DC 20402
United States of America

National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS Publication Sales
Box 6000 Department F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  Note: NIJ Report 100-83
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.