skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 97279 Find in a Library
Title: Uncompensated Appointments of Attorneys for Indigent Criminal Defense - The Need for Supreme Court Standards
Journal: Southwestern University Law Review  Volume:14  Issue:2  Dated:(1984)  Pages:389-416
Author(s): V R Kendrdick
Date Published: 1984
Page Count: 28
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: A U.S. Supreme Court decision that mandates reasonable compensation for court-appointed attorneys is needed, so as to alleviate current State legislative and judicial problems in this area.
Abstract: The case of Gideon v. Wainwright greatly expanded the traditional right to counsel but provided no guidelines or directions to the States to help them implement that right. The need for Supreme Court intervention has recently become particularly pressing. First, uncompensated appointments of attorneys hurt the involved defendants more than the attorneys. Both studies and current cases support the correlation between the amount of money expended for defense services and the resulting quality of representation. In fact, some attorneys admit to the existence of a dual standard for representing the indigent. Second, State legislatures are increasingly failing to allocate sufficient funds for indigent criminal defense services. In addition, attorneys continue to burden already-congested State court systems with escalating numbers of complaints and proceedings stemming from uncompensated appointments. A Supreme Court finding that an appointed attorney must be reasonably compensated for services would ease State court administrative burdens and prod recalcitrant State legislatures into more realistic and equitable allocations of funds for indigent defense services. The Court must recognize that an indigent criminal defendant cannot be adequately represented by an uncompensated attorney. A total of 190 notes are provided.
Index Term(s): Court appointed counsel; Defense services; Indigents; Legal fees; State courts; US Supreme Court decisions
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=97279

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.