skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 97285 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Warrentless Investigative Seizures and Searches of Automobiles and Their Contents and Occupants
Journal: George Mason University Law Review  Volume:6  Issue:1  Dated:(Spring 1983)  Pages:1-68
Author(s): Anonymous
Date Published: 1983
Page Count: 68
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
National Science Foundation
Arlington, VA 22230
US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 75-NI-00-0080; SOC 76-24217
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The validity of warrantless searches of automobiles should be decided on a case by case basis; in addition, other alternatives should be considered to prevent unnecessary invasions of personal privacy.
Abstract: Warrantless searches are permitted based on the automobile exception to the rule requiring a warrant for a search and seizure and in connection with a lawful arrest of a vehicle occupant. The validity of a search under the automobile exception should depend on probable cause regarding seizable items in the automobile and circumstances making it dangerous or impractical for the police to obtain a warrant. Warrantless searches occurring in connection with an arrest should depend on the reasonable chance that the arrested occupants could enter the automobile and seize a weapon or evidence before being taken to a police station or jail. Other alternatives could protect the police and the public as well as preserve evidence. Among these are authorizing police to handcuff all lawfully arrested occupants of an automobile, to lock the persons in a police vehicle, to temporarily lock any containers found in the automobile in the automobile's trunk or in a police vehicle, to lock the vehicle and have it towed to a police impoundment lot, and to have a police officer drive the vehicle to the impoundment lot. For searches conducted under the automobile exception, the standard adopted in the case of United States v. Ross should determine the validity of a warrantless search of a container. A total of 323 footnotes are supplied.
Index Term(s): US Supreme Court decisions; Vehicle searches; Warrantless search
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.