skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 97342 Find in a Library
Title: Myth, the Reality, and the Future of Environmental Mediation
Journal: Environment  Volume:24  Issue:7  Dated:(September 1982)  Pages:14-17,36-39
Author(s): G W Cormick
Date Published: 1982
Page Count: 8
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Based on the experiences of the Institute for Environmental Mediation, this article describes the various types of intervention processes used in environmental disputes, issues to be discussed before submitting a conflict to mediation, and common misconceptions about mediation.
Abstract: Since 1983, the Institute has helped resolve about 24 complex disputes. Intervenors in environmental cases have three essential characteristics: impartiality, a focus and expertise relating to process rather than subject matter, and the goal of achieving a mutually derived and acceptable outcome. There are, however, at least three different types of intervention processes: consensus building, mediation, and policy dialogues. These processes differ in their assumptions, intervenors' activities, and anticipated outcomes. The Institute suggests eight specific questions that must be answered before mediation begins. They consider representation, scope of the issue, deadlines, trust in the mediator, and commitment to a good faith effort to reach agreement. Contrary to popular opinion, mediation does not resolve basic differences, but allows parties to coexist despite their differences. It does not avoid conflict and is not nonadversarial. Other misconceptions are that mediation is an alternative to litigation and its success depends on negotiators liking and trusting one another. The Institute has found that mediators with expertise regarding the issues in a dispute may be less effective. The article discusses future directions in mediation and provides examples of cases mediated by Institute members. It includes six footnotes.
Index Term(s): Corpus delicti; Dispute resolution; Mediation
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=97342

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.