skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 97350 Find in a Library
Title: Means of Executing Searches and Seizures as Fourth Amendment Issues
Journal: Minnesota Law Review  Volume:67  Issue:1  Dated:(October 1982)  Pages:89-177
Author(s): G E Dix
Date Published: 1982
Page Count: 89
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article examines whether the fourth amendment's requirement of 'reasonableness' as a basis for searches and seizures does or should go beyond requiring a reasonably precise warrant and evidence adequate to justify an intrusion upon protected interests.
Abstract: The number and nature of issues surrounding the matter in which an otherwise reasonable search or seizure is conducted are addressed, with attention to the Louisiana Supreme Court's decision in State v. Sierra. The court noted that although 'the language of the fourth amendment may arguably extend to searches made with probable cause that are conducted in an improper manner, there is little explicit support in judicial decisions for this proposition despite the tremendous number of cases that involve the fourth amendment.' U.S. Supreme Court cases relating to the fourth amendment are concluded to provide conflicting signals and few definitive holdings concerning this aspect of the scope of the fourth amendment. The author concludes that although the content of the privacy interests protected by the fourth amendment has not been precisely articulated by the courts, specifically regarding the mode of conducting searches, certain aspects should to include (1) the extent of force used in the search and seizure, (2) the time of the search, and (3) the duration of the search. Recommendations for appropriate restrictions in these areas are offered. Included are 302 references.
Index Term(s): Police legal limitations; Search and seizure; Search and seizure laws; Search warrants; US Supreme Court decisions
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=97350

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.