skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 97479 Find in a Library
Title: Telephone Conferencing in Criminal Court Cases
Journal: University of Miami Law Review  Volume:38  Issue:4  Dated:(July 1984)  Pages:611-624
Author(s): R A Hanson; L K E Olson; K L Shuart; M Thornton
Date Published: 1984
Page Count: 14
Type: Program Description (Model)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article highlights essential findings from a pilot project which used telephone conferencing in criminal cases in New Jersey and Colorado and reviews the reaction of judges and attorneys to the innovation.
Abstract: The criminal court business that was handled included substantive, procedural, and discovery-related matters. The matters heard by telephone conferencing at various stages of criminal process included municipal court appeals, entry of pleas, sentencing, motions, and witness testimony. Specific instances in which telephone conferencing was used are noted; situations in which conferencing proved a suitable alternative to in-person hearings are identified. Considerations in determining where the conference call was to originate are explored, and judges' reactions to the procedure are discussed. Among the advantages they noted was the greater operational efficiency of the court, especially in scheduling flexibility and time savings. The judges indicated that telephone hearings did not sacrifice the rights or interests of criminal defendants. Results of interviews with attorneys indicate that most were satisfied with how telephone hearings were conducted and saw little difference between in-person and telephone hearings. Attorneys acknowledged that they saved much time when hearings were conducted by telephone and felt that telephone hearings offered substantial benefits to their clients. The article concludes that telephone conferencing in criminal cases is a viable option in the overall scheme to increase judicial efficiency. One table and 16 footnotes are included.
Index Term(s): Alternative court procedures; Colorado; Hearings; Model programs; New Jersey; Telephone communications
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=97479

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.