skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 97480 Find in a Library
Title: Telephonic Search Warrants
Journal: University of Miami Law Review  Volume:38  Issue:4  Dated:(July 1984)  Pages:625-635
Author(s): G P Alpert
Date Published: 1984
Page Count: 11
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article focuses upon the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure in relation to telephonic search warrants and upon several controversial issues involved with their use.
Abstract: The amendment to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules allows for a warrant to be issued under certain circumstances 'based upon sworn and oral testimony communicated by telephone or other appropriate means.' The basic requirements that must be met under this provision are outlined. For example, the warrant must be requested by a 'Federal law enforcement officer or an attorney for the government,' and application for the warrant must be made to a Federal magistrate. The oral testimony in support of the warrant must be sworn and recorded, with the oath administered by the magistrate in advance. Additionally, the magistrate must record the call after being informed that its purpose is to request a warrant. Issues concerning the acquisition and use of telephone search warrants include (1) problems arising if the magistrate does not have a recording device available, or if the device fails, (2) questions regarding the issuance of a warrant based on an informant's testimony, and (3) the extent to which warrantless searches will continue to be justified when telephonic warrants are available. Included are 53 footnotes.
Index Term(s): Alternative court procedures; Federal regulations; Search warrants; Telephone communications; Warrantless search
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.