skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 97502 Find in a Library
Title: Incriminating Criminal Evidence - Practical Solutions
Journal: Pacific Law Journal  Volume:15  Issue:3  Dated:(April 1984)  Pages:807-877
Author(s): B S Martin
Date Published: 1984
Page Count: 71
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article discusses aspects of attorney-client privilege law pertaining to implicating evidence and analyzes the evidentiary, constitutional, criminal, and ethical laws applicable to implicating evidence situations in California.
Abstract: The constitutional ramifications of an attorney's handling of implicating evidence is discussed, focusing on a defendant's right to effective assistance of counsel, the defendant's right against self-incrimination, and the protection that the attorney-client privilege affords these rights. Action taken by attorneys in dealing with implicating evidence is analyzed to determine whether the attorney's conduct constitutes ineffective assistance of counsel or malpractice under present law. The article also focuses on crimes that an attorney may commit when dealing with implicating evidence, emphasizing the crimes of destruction or concealment of evidence. An attorney's conflicting ethical duties in dealing with implicating evidence and situations in which the attorney may be ethically required to withdraw from representing the client are examined. The article makes specific recommendations for advice to clients and third parties who inform attorneys about implicating evidence or who bring the evidence to an attorney's office. Specific U.S. Supreme Court decisions are examined in reference to the aforementioned concerns. A total of 287 case notes are supplied. (Author summary modified)
Index Term(s): Attorneys; California; Evidence; US Supreme Court decisions
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.