skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 97562 Find in a Library
Title: Quality of Police Arrest Statistics
Author(s): L W Sherman; B D Glick
Date Published: 1984
Page Count: 7
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
US Dept of Justice
Washington, DC 20531
US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 80-IJ-CX-0039
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF|PDF
Type: Survey
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Under a grant from the National Institute of Justice, the Police Foundation conducted a national study of police adult arrest statistics from 1980 to 1982.
Abstract: The report shows that arrest statistics are not comparable across police departments, because there is widespread violation of the rules established by the FBI for compiling arrest statistics. The Police Foundation study used various data collection methods, including 1-day site visits to 18 police departments to interview recordkeeping staff and observe arrest operations, a survey questionnaire mailed to 239 sheriffs' departments, a mail survey of State agencies gathering local police statistics, and 4 case studies. The case studies involved 2-week site visits to four police departments to observe booking operations. The study found that State Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) agencies allocate relatively little effort to regulating arrest statistics and that the regulators themselves often fail to recall the UCR counting rules. Errors across agencies were also found; they are attributed to policies governing supervisory review of arrests; to failure to include citations, summonses, and citizens' arrests; to multiple charges placed against a single person; and to shared jurisdictions. The case studies revealed such sloppiness that two departments reported fewer arrests than they actually made, and one reported 14 percent more. These findings suggest that the regulation of arrest statistics is inadequate and that UCR arrest statistics cannot be used to evaluate police performance. Two tables and 10 references are included.
Index Term(s): Arrest statistics; Data integrity; Police department surveys; Uniform crime reporting
Note: Police Foundation Reports, N 2 (August 1984).
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.