skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 97650 Find in a Library
Title: Why Courts Overrule Arbitrators' Awards
Journal: Labor Law Journal  Volume:36  Issue:2  Dated:(February 1985)  Pages:108-117
Author(s): E C Stephens
Date Published: 1985
Page Count: 10
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article examines current court decisions that address the overruling of arbitrators' awards.
Abstract: The grounds for attacking an arbitration award under common law are listed; they include fraud, misconduct, and gross unfairness by the arbitrator. Attention focuses on the most recent Supreme Court decision on the review of arbitration awards, W.R. Grace & Co. v. Rubber Workers Local 759. The Court's reliance on the standards set forth in the Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel and Car Corporation case is noted. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit's interpretation of this standard is explained in its decision in Arco-Polymers, Inc. v. OCAW, Local 8-74. Decisions indicate that a court may review an arbitrator's award if it appears that the arbitrator substituted his judgment for that of the parties, the award does not draw its essence from the contract, the award contains material error, and the award is against public law or policy. Cases illustrating these criteria are discussed; for example, Bacardi Corp. v. Congreso de Union, Miller Brewing Co. v. Brewery Workers, and St. Louis Theatrical Co. v. Local 6 are discussed as cases in which the arbitrators exceeded their authority. Riceland Foods v. Carpenters Local 2381 and Zeigler Coal Co. v. District 12 are described as cases in which the arbitrators substituted their judgments for those of management. These cases indicate that an arbitrator's award is not always final and binding on the parties. Included are 47 references.
Index Term(s): Arbitration; Arbitrators; Collective bargaining; US Supreme Court decisions
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=97650

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.