skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 97655 Find in a Library
Title: Divorce Mediation - Therapists in the Legal World
Journal: American Journal of Family Therapy  Volume:13  Issue:1  Dated:(Spring 1985)  Pages:3-10
Author(s): L Marlow
Date Published: 1985
Page Count: 8
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This paper analyzes the assumptions implicit in the legal profession's model of divorce and argues their inadequacies and inappropriateness.
Abstract: The question of whether divorce is a legal event is raised; the principal reason given to justify that divorce is primarily a legal event is provided: divorce is regulated by the law. However, divorce, like marriage, is a personal event that has only legal implications. The paper refutes the idea that separating and divorcing couples must seek legal counsel, first to determine their legal rights and then to protect those rights. Additionally, the paper debunks the myth that what is at issue in a couple's separation and divorce is the determination of their respective legal rights. This misconception is due to a failure to distinguish between two types of law that a State enacts. The first category is generally constitutional in nature, guaranteeing citizens right to vote, speak, or practice the religion of their choice. The second category contains the numerous laws which are enacted to regulate society's conduct or simply to resolve disputes; these laws represent legal rules rather than legal rights. The application of these rules and principles is ineffective in deciding disputes between separating and divorcing couples. The legal system elevates conflicting interests to an absolute, destroying the possibility of compromise. Divorce mediation is suggested as a viable means of resolving the personal conflicts of marriage. Seven references are included.
Index Term(s): Alternative dispute settlement; Divorce mediation; Mediation; Mediators
Note: *This document is currently unavailable from NCJRS.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=97655

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.