skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 97720 Find in a Library
Title: Terrorism as a Desperate Game - Fear, Bargaining, and Communication in the Terrorist Event
Journal: Journal of Conflict Resolution  Volume:25  Issue:1  Dated:(March 1981)  Pages:47-85
Author(s): J R Corsi
Date Published: 1981
Page Count: 39
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Political terrorism is examined theoretically and empirically, with a focus on violent acts initiated on behalf of minority interests and committed by individuals or small cadres to harm establishment persons or elite property.
Abstract: The discussion implicitly assumes that the terrorist act is meant to affect a large audience, so emphasis is placed on the theatricality of terrorist acts and the importance of communication. A typology presented considers 2 dimensions: the terrorist intention to capture or not to capture persons or property and the known versus the unknown location of the target. Each of these types is examined with respect to the following characteristics: immediate damage to the target, subsequent threat to the target, short-term danger to the terrorists when demands are likely to be made, law enforcement response, negotiations, and duration of the incident. Assumptions of the model are tested using the ITERATE data set, which covers 539 events of international terrorism occurring between 1970 and 1974. Decision routes are mapped as a method for conceptualizing the tactics involved in bargaining. Formal game theory is used to explore the complexities of modeling government terrorist interactions with regard to developing an extensive game form, specifying utilities, and constructing illustrative games. Probability functions for an empirically based decision model are generated using responses and outcomes for the cases in the data set. Discriminant function analysis is used to specify quantitatively the degree to which the types are distinct as posited. Emphasized is the significance of communications (implicit and direct, calculated and manipulative) which result from terrorist-target bargaining interaction. Tabular data and 51 references are provided. (Author abstract modified)
Index Term(s): Counter-terrorism tactics; Discriminant analysis; Hostage negotiations; International terrorism; Models; Terrorism simulation; Terrorist tactics; Threat assessment
Note: Earlier version presented at the Third Biennial Meeting of the International Society for Research on Aggression, Washington, DC, September 23, 1978.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=97720

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.