skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 97853 Find in a Library
Title: Alternatives to Incarceration - The Community Correctional Center
Author(s): S M Czajkowski
Corporate Author: Federal Bureau of Prisons
US Dept of Justice
United States of America
Date Published: 1985
Page Count: 4
Sponsoring Agency: Federal Bureau of Prisons
Washington, DC 20534
National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Program/Project Evaluation
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This report describes and evaluates the first year of a Federal Bureau of Prisons alternative program, the Community Correctional Center (CCC), which diverts inmates who occupy the lowest security level to residence in a contract facility in southeast Washington, D.C.
Abstract: Inmates are eligible for the CCC if they are (1) classified as minimum-security offenders with a commitment not to exceed 1 year, (2) recommended by the sentencing judge for the CCC, and (3) a resident of the Washington, D.C, metropolitan area. There were 34 inmates incarcerated and then released to CCC from March 1983 through February 1984. The typical inmate was 32 years old, black, single, male, with at least a high school education, and little or no prior criminal history. Most were employed at arrest and had been convicted of traffic offenses and drug-related or white-collar crimes. All but seven of these inmates kept their jobs or found jobs during commitment to the CCC. Two were full-time students, and the remaining five were eventually transferred to a prison as program failures. Inmates participated in community service projects and were actively involved in drug or alcohol abuse, job training, and life skills programs. In most cases the CCC was serving as an alternative to incarceration, although some inmates may have been diverted from probation. The CCC's cost effectiveness over incarceration is uncertain at this early stage. While the CCC began slowly, judges now perceive it as a credible alternative and are using the program more. Accountability is built into the CCC through a system of increasingly severe sanctions and a weekly urinalysis program. There was only one instance of criminal behavior by a program resident during the first year of operation. A chart and three references are supplied.
Index Term(s): Community-based corrections (adult); District of Columbia; Employment; Juvenile probation effectiveness; Program evaluation
Note: Research Review.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=97853

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.