skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 97928 Find in a Library
Title: Social Costs of the Criminal Justice System - Methodological Notes
Journal: Crime and Justice  Volume:7/8  Issue:3/4  Dated:(1979/1980)  Pages:180-189
Author(s): V Blankevoort; P Landreville; A P Pires
Date Published: 1980
Page Count: 10
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: French
Country: Canada
Annotation: Through the use of concrete examples and theoretically, the authors present relevant methodological and epistemological considerations about qualitative research methods and their use in criminological research.
Abstract: Following a summary of the methodological and epistemological oppositions which have plagued social analysis, the authors explicate the main epistemological assumptions to which they subscribed for their research on the social costs of the criminal justice system. This study is discussed in detail, including a statement of the research problem, the variables examined, and the choice of methodology. Emphasis is placed on methodological concerns and the distance which necessarily exists between a proposed research strategy and the actual research practices which are dictated either by unexpected findings or by difficulties encountered by the research team while carrying out the proposed project. Included are 22 references. (Author abstract modified)
Index Term(s): Criminal justice research; Criminology; Research methods; Sociological analyses
Note: *This document is currently unavailable from NCJRS.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.