skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 97991 Find in a Library
Title: Politics of Environmental Mediation
Journal: Ecology Law Quarterly  Volume:11  Issue:1  Dated:(1983)  Pages:1-19
Author(s): D J May
Date Published: 1983
Page Count: 19
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The politics of environmental mediation as a process in which representatives of environmental groups, business groups, and government agencies sit down together with a neutral mediator to negotiate a binding resolution to a particular environmental dispute is presented.
Abstract: Potential political biases against environmentalists in the mediation process are examined: (1) the possibility that the congenial atmosphere created by mediators serves to disarm and co-opt environmentalists; (2) a power imbalance between the two parties may yield unfair concessions from environmentalists to prodevelopment interests; and (3) the possibility that the mediation process itself tends to redefine environmental issues in a way that favors prodevelopment interests. Suggestions are discussed for avoiding the bias factor in mediation. It is suggested that in certain disputes, (for example, nuclear power, where compromise is not appropriate) the problem of definitional bias may not allow for the discussion of workable solutions. The mediator should keep in mind that each issue involves a mixture of negotiable and nonnegotiable issues. Since the mediator desires to keep discussion at a reasonable level, bias often emerges not necessarily as a result of any personal political bias on the part of individual mediators, but as a function of the inherent limitations of the mediation process. It is suggested that mediation works best in disputes that are primarily local and that do not involve basic value conflicts or structural choices. It is recommended that environmentalists concentrate on building greater sources of formal political power. Seventy-seven footnotes are provided.
Index Term(s): Conflict resolution; Corporate self-regulation; Environmental laws; Mediation
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.