skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 98043 Find in a Library
Title: Neutral Mediator - Value Dilemmas in Divorce Mediation
Journal: Mediation Quarterly  Issue:4  Dated:(June 1984)  Pages:61-74
Author(s): S E Bernard; J P Folger; H R Weingarten; Z R Zuneta
Date Published: 1984
Page Count: 14
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: In this paper, ethical and value issues facing the divorce mediator are considered and highlighted by two case examples.
Abstract: in divorce mediation, the practitioner must choose to act either as a neutral, facilitative third party; as a proponent of a just and fair settlement; as a protector of a weak party; or as some combination of these. In mediation, the settlement strategy, the extent to which the mediator seeks to shape the outcome, is of central importance. Settlement strategies fall along a continuum from neutral to interventionist, with option-enhancing and empowerment through information strategies falling somewhere in between. The mediator's choice of strategy will be influenced by his values. The values involved include conflict versus consensus, justice, self-determination, and moral conceptions of the family. All of these value positions influence the mediator away from the theoretically desirable neutral stance. As pure neutrality is very difficult to achieve and sustain, an alternate position is proposed. The mediator can identify and share with the parties his own value preferences. Although the neutral strategy is recommended, deviation from this stance should be explicitly and deliberately chosen and justified. By sharing value preferences, the mediator enables the parties to retain some control over the influence exerted by the mediator. Provided are 21 references.
Index Term(s): Attitudes; Divorce mediation; Professional conduct and ethics; Standards
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.