skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 98054 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Final Report of the Divorce Mediation Research Project
Author(s): J Pearson; N Thoennes
Corporate Author: Assoc of Family and Conciliation Courts
Research Unit
United States of America
Date Published: 1984
Page Count: 810
Sponsoring Agency: Assoc of Family and Conciliation Courts
Denver, CO 80218
US Dept of Health and Human Services
Washington, DC 20447
Grant Number: 90-CW-634
Document: PDF
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This report contains 12 papers describing findings of the Divorce Mediation Research Project, a 3-year project involving surveys of operating services throughout the United States and indepth studies of 3 public-sector mediation services: the Los Angeles Conciliation Court of the Los Angeles Superior Court, the Custody Resolution Counseling Program of Hennepin County Court (Minnesota), and the Family Division of the Connecticut Superior Court.
Abstract: Goals of the project are to (1) measure and compare the outcomes, cost, and impacts of mediation and traditional adversarial processes; (2) identify the characteristics of the dispute, the disputants, and the mediators which are associated with successful mediation outcomes; and (3) measure and compare specific outcomes of different model programs. A variety of methods were used to gather data and construct the research data base -- survey and mail questionnaires, observation, interviews with court staff, clients, and their families, audiotaping of sessions, and followup surveys and studies of court records. Comparisons were also made with cases in six Colorado courts not offering court-based mediation and with non-contested custody cases in Denver. The papers discuss the findings. The first reviews the literature on alternatives to court adjudication, concluding that many proponents of mediation have oversold it as an alternative. The second discusses four issues to address before implementing divorce mediation in the public sector: the government's role in mediation services; the legal authority for mediation services; the service structure that maximizes administrative and cost efficiencies; and the specific procedures governing the process. Additional papers describe mediation services in the public and private sectors, custody mediation at three study sites and client reactions to the programs, and children's adjustment to divorce. Also examined is the mediation process analysis, a descriptive coding system for predicting the outcomes of divorce mediation. Overall, findings show that settlement rates fluctuate around 50 percent and that all three formats studied are viable as measured by their ability to mediate agreements and to satisfy professional staff and clients, even those clients who do not settle. Mediation is preferred over evaluations do not settle. Mediation is preferred over evaluations and court hearings as a method of resolving disputes over custody and visitation. Appendixes contain study instruments and list publications, papers, and presentations of the Divorce Mediation Research Project. Approximately 250 references, 25 figures, and 100 tables are included. For individual papers, see NCJ 98055-98066.
Index Term(s): Alternative dispute settlement; California; Child custody; Connecticut; Divorce mediation; Minnesota
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.