skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 98078 Find in a Library
Title: International Summaries: Dutch Experiments With Community Service
Author(s): J Junger-Tas
Corporate Author: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
United States of America
Date Published: Unknown
Page Count: 4
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Rockville, MD 20849
US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
Washington, DC 20531
Contract Number: J-LEAA-023-77
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS Publication Sales
Box 6000 Department F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Program/Project Evaluation
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This report explains the evaluation of community service (CS) as a penal sanction for adults in the Netherlands, presents as a penal sanction for adults in the Netherlands, presents evaluation results, and recommends three changes in Dutch penal law.
Abstract: In 1980, the Dutch Minister of Justice appointed a commission to establish experimental CS programs in 8 of the country's 19 court districts starting in 1981. Goals of the CS experiment were to reduce the number of prison sentences of up to 6 months, to complete CS within specified time limits (maximum of 150 hours to be completed within 6 months), to produce a positive experience for the offender and supervising agency, and to contain reconviction rates to be comparable with those of similar offenders receiving other dispositions. Data on the operation of CS came from records compiled between February 1981 and May 1982. A total of 453 cases were analyzed. Interviews were conducted with prosecutors, judges, probation workers, the staff of community agencies, and offenders assigned to CS. Data were obtained on offender characteristics, the decisionmaking process, work placements and hours, control and feedback to judicial authorities, CS organization, and CS outcomes. Three approaches were used to determine whether or not CS increased the number of persons drawn into the criminal justice system or increased the severity of sanctions. CS offenders were compared with those refused CS, with all offenders sentenced to 6 months or less, and with fined offenders. CS did succeed in reducing the number of offenders sentenced to prison terms of 6 months or less, and CS orders were generally successfully completed. CS was also usually a positive experience for the offender and the supervising agency. The commission recommended that the penal code be changed to make CS either a prosecutorial disposition, a major judicial sanction, or a form of pardon.
Index Term(s): Community service order; Community service programs; Law reform; Netherlands; Program evaluation
Note: This article was originally published in The Netherlands in August 1984. NIJ/NCJRS international summary of "Dutch Experiments With Community Service" (NCJ-98290).
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.