skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 98086 Find in a Library
Title: Saving the Child - Rejuvenating a Dying Right to Rehabilitation
Journal: New England Journal on Criminal and Civil Confinement  Volume:11  Issue:1  Dated:(Winter 1985)  Pages:123-159
Author(s): M L Blasko
Date Published: 1985
Page Count: 37
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The right to treatment is examined within the context of the history and goals of the juvenile justice system and recent case law.
Abstract: The underlying rationale of the juvenile court at its inception was the doctrine of parens patriae which was based on the assumption that the state would act in the child's best interest: the focus was on saving, not punishing, the child. As juvenile justice evolved, an appreciation of the child's distinct status resulted in the formation of a right to treatment for incarcerated juveniles as an avenue to guarantee the promises of the juvenile justice philosophy. The right to treatment doctrine has had an erratic history. With the U.S. Supreme Court avoiding the issue, there has been disagreement between the appeals courts regarding the soundest propositions for and against the establishment of the right. Neither the First nor the Fifth Circuit Courts (in Morales v. Turmand and Santana v. Collazo) have upheld a constitutional right to rehabilitative treatment. While Federal courts and legal scholars have expressed optimism regarding a juvenile's guaranteed right to rehabilitative treatment, the lack of U.S. Supreme Court approval has resulted in ad hoc application of this right among jurisdictions. This reluctance to take a firm stance has prevented States from restructuring their juvenile justice systems and will continue to postpone the eradication of juvenile crime. Footnotes are provided.
Index Term(s): Correctional reform; Corrections policies; Judicial decisions; Juvenile justice reform; Juvenile rehabilitation; Juveniles right to treatment; Policy analysis; Prisoner's rights; Rights of minors
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.