skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 98094 Find in a Library
Title: Death Penalty - The Caryl Chessman Case - Irreversible Error
Journal: San Fernando Valley Law Review  Volume:11  Dated:(1983)  Pages:21-42
Author(s): E G Brown; A L Alarcon; F M Cooper
Date Published: 1983
Page Count: 22
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Changes in the penal code since Caryl Chessman's 1948 trial are discussed with reference to what the effect of these changes might have had on the outcome of the case.
Abstract: In 1948, Chessman was convicted of 17 felonies; for 2 of these the jury imposed the death penalty. These two counts were for violation of Penal Code section 209, kidnapping for the purpose of robbery. This statute had been amended in 1933 in the aftermath of the notorious Lindbergh kidnapping. Chessman's first appeal in 1951 argued that a recent amendment of the broad wording of the 1933 statute should be applied to him, particularly in view of the legislative intent that stand-still robberies be excluded from its provision. In subsequent cases, the courts promulgated a new test for determining whether robbery involving the movement of the victim could be punished under Penal Code section 209: was the movement merely incidental to the crime? If so, did it substantially increase the risk of harm? A reassessment of the Chessman case, using this test, indicates that the conviction should not have been sustained. Moreover, errors in instructions to the jury operated to Chessman's prejudice, resulting in the imposition of the death penalty. Finally, an examination of the gross disparity between the punishments affixed to violation of Penal Code section 209 and that for first-degree murder compels the conclusion that the death penalty meted out to Chessman could not withstand constitutional scurtiny today. A total of 51 footnotes are provided.
Index Term(s): Capital punishment; Constitutional Rights/Civil Liberties; Kidnapping; US Supreme Court decisions
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=98094

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.