skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 98099 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Judicial Management of Prisons? Responses to Prison Litigation
Journal: Prison Journal  Volume:65  Issue:1  Dated:(Spring-Summer 1985)  Pages:26-37
Author(s): W L Selke
Date Published: 1985
Page Count: 12
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This analysis of sentencing reforms and the effects of litigation on prison conditions concludes that lawsuits under Section 1983 of the U.S. Civil Rights Act have been effectively clarifying the realities of prison conditions and in showing how costly imprisonment is.
Abstract: Prison overcrowding has been complicated by the national movement away from the rehabilitation concept and indeterminate sentencing. Determinate and presumptive sentencing codes have been passed, despite many criticisms of the underlying just deserts model. The harsher codes have led to large increases in prison populations without increases in funding to allow corrections officials to deal effectively with added responsibilities. Typical of recent suits brought under Section 1983 is French v. Owens, a class action suit brought on behalf of all inmates at the Indiana Reformatory. The facility was found to be beyond repair, dirty and unsanitary, grossly overcrowded, lacking in acceptable medical and mental health care, and in violation of State laws regarding minimal provision of educational and vocational programs. The court decision in 1982 found that the overcrowding and other conditions constituted cruel and inhuman treatment of inmates in violation of the 8th and 14th amendments. The State legislators were held responsible for failing to appropriate adequate funds. In view of this and other court decisions, the most reasonable approach seems to be to seek alternatives to incarceration for nonviolent offenders. However, current proposals are for funding to construct more prisons and additions to current ones. More constructive and reasoned sentencing reforms are needed. Thirty-three references are listed.
Index Term(s): Class action lawsuits; Correctional reform; Facility conditions; Indiana; Inmate lawsuits; Prisoner's rights; Sentencing reform
Note: *This document is currently unavailable from NCJRS.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.