skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 98109 Find in a Library
Title: In Search of Resonable Doubt - A Systematic Examination of Selected Qualification Approaches
Journal: Law and Human Behavior  Volume:9  Issue:2  Dated:(June 1985)  Pages:141-158
Author(s): F C Dane
Date Published: 1985
Page Count: 18
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study examined the empirical validity of selected approaches for quantifying jurors' concepts of reasonable doubt by using estimates derived from each approach to recreate the decisions of students who read a criminal trial transcript and comparing the recreated decisions to the actual trial decisions.
Abstract: The four approaches assessed were Simon's rank-order technique (1970), a self-report approach, a statistical decision theory (Fried, Kaplan, and Klein 1975), and one derived from Justice White's explanation of the Johnson v. Louisiana (1972) decision. Both the rank-order and the Supreme Court approaches assume that the value for reasonable doubt is the same for all individuals exposed to the same information while the other two approaches do not include this assumption. Participants in the study were 168 student volunteers from introductory psychology courses at a large midwestern university who were divided into 42 separate 'juries' of 4 persons each. The results of the analysis indicated that every approach accurately matched the actual decisions at a better-than-chance rate, although the rank-order and statistical decision theory approaches were most accurate. The study also used the reasonable doubt estimates obtained from each of the approaches to examine the basic assumption underlying the Thomas and Hogue (1976) juror decision model. Only the estimates from the statistical decision theory approach provided consistent support for this model. The paper discusses the advantages and problems associated with each approach and suggests directions for future research. Tables and approximately 30 references are supplied. (Author abstract modified)
Index Term(s): Jury decisionmaking; Mathematical modeling; Reasonable doubt
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.