skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 98177 Find in a Library
Title: Civil Liability for Arson Fires - The Case Against the Owners (From Neighborhood Based Arson Control - Collected Papers, P 26-51, 1985 - See NCJ-98175)
Author(s): A Delibert
Corporate Author: Citizens Cmtte for Fire Prevention
United States of America
Date Published: 1985
Page Count: 28
Sponsoring Agency: Citizens Cmtte for Fire Prevention
Washington, DC 20036
National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: A fire victim can often successfully sue the owner of the building in which the fire occurred, even though the cause of the fire is not precisely known or an intruder not connected with the owner is known to have set the fire.
Abstract: Under the legal theories of negligence, it is sufficient cause for liability that the owner of the building in which the fire occurred left the building vacant and unsealed against intruders, thus substantially increasing the risk of a fire. With regard to proximate cause, an element that must be proven in negligence, the primary issue is whether or not an intruder's firesetting is a 'superceding cause.' If so, the building owner would be relieved of liability for the fire. The courts, however, are not likely to hold that the intruder's actions are a superceding cause, since they are a foreseeable consequence of the owner's negligence in leaving the building unsecured. New York's 'one-building rule' limits the liability of the fired-building owner to damages caused to property directly adjacent to the fired building. The rationale underlying this rule is outdated, and the prospects for overturning it are good. Although a successful suit against a building owner will not fully compensate for the disruption and damage caused by a fire, significant monetary awards will encourage building owners to provide proper security for their vacant buildings in the future. Ninety-five footnotes are provided. (Author summary modified)
Index Term(s): Arson; Civil liability; Civil remedies; Landlord liability; Negligence; New York
Note: For microfiche, see NCJ-098175.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.