skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 98183 Find in a Library
Title: Towards Just Welfare - A Consideration of a Current Controversy in the Theory of Juvenile Justice
Journal: British Journal of Criminology  Volume:25  Issue:1  Dated:(January 1985)  Pages:31-45
Author(s): R J Harris
Date Published: 1985
Page Count: 15
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United Kingdom
Annotation: The argument that Great Britain's Children and Young Persons Act 1969 failed because of its welfare approach is misconceived. A better conceptual framework for social workers and other professionals who have accepted arguments of the 'back of justice' movement is needed.
Abstract: The failure of the Act was inevitable because of theory, implementation, and ideology problems. For example, reformist rehabilitory ideas and the influence of 'misfit sociology' with its emphasis on diversion and deinstitutionalization created tensions in the Act. The law came into force the same day the social services department, the agency most concerned with its implementation, was created. In addition to organizational chaos, there have been serious conflicts between the demands made on social workers as supervisory agents of the court and their own occupational culture. Despite its welfare approach, the Act has resulted in more removals of young offenders from their homes. The peculiar relationship between justice and welfare also has contributed to increases in punitive sentencing and sentencing disparities. The American experience with retributivist sentencing shows that problems in the juvenile justice system do not disappear with the demise of welfare. An improved framework for social work in the juvenile system links both welfare and justice theories. Social workers need to develop additional skills and knowledge in problem-solving strategies and increase their critical awareness of claims made by advocates of differing positions. Welfare, like justice, should be limited by the nature of the offense, and the additional involvement of welfare professionals in a case should be voluntary. Approximately 40 references are provided.
Index Term(s): Custody vs treatment conflict; Foreign juvenile justice systems; Great Britain/United Kingdom; Juvenile codes; Juvenile justice reform; Social work
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.