skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 98209 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Punishment and Risk Management as an Oregon Sanctioning Model Final Report - Oregon Prison Overcrowding Project
Corporate Author: Oregon Council on Crime and Delinquency
United States of America
Date Published: 1985
Page Count: 136
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Oregon Council on Crime and Delinquency
Portland, OR 97209
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This report presents the recommendations of the Oregon Prison Overcrowding Project (OPOP), summarizes how project members arrived at these recommendations, and presents a correctional philosophy for Oregon.
Abstract: OPOP conducted three surveys which formed the basis of their recommendations. The first survey gathered data on 1,003 prison inmates, 2,240 persons released from community jails, and 3,312 probationers. The second data set is an inventory of both sanctions and services conducted on a county-by-county basis; the third is a survey of Oregon public opinion on correctional issues. OPOP concluded that Oregon's correctional policies are basically sound, but recommends a clear and consistent criminal justice sanctioning philosophy and a coordinated punishment/risk management sentencing policy. There are numerous advantages to a punishment/risk management model. For example, it recognizes the importance of social response to crime and the equity in sentencing offenders and it retains a level of discretion within the sanctioning system. Such a model would be applicable to decisionmaking at all points across the criminal justice system, not just corrections. There are three principal technical implications of a risk management model. First, risk-screening devices are useful for identifying low-, rather than high-, risk offenders. Second, the statistical basis for risk management policies must be sound; and third, risk management practices must be devised for early identification and classification of errors. To accomplish the development of a valid, reliable risk assessment tool, OPOP supports the formation of a Criminal Justice Council. Thirty-two notes are included.
Index Term(s): Oregon; Prison overcrowding; Punishment; Risk management; Sentencing/Sanctions
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.