skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 98295 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Impact of the Speedy Trial Act on Investigation and Prosecution of Federal Criminal Cases
Author(s): N L Ames; T M Hammett; L D Stellwagen
Corporate Author: Abt Associates, Inc
United States of America
Date Published: 1985
Page Count: 150
Sponsoring Agency: Abt Associates, Inc
Cambridge, MA 02138
National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
US Dept of Justice
Washington, DC 20530
Contract Number: 3C00102
Publication Number: AAI 85-36
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This analysis of the impact of the 1974 Speedy Trial Act, which established strict time limits for processing all Federal criminal cases, concludes that the law has been generally effective in bringing accused offenders to swift justice.
Abstract: Study data came from a telephone survey of 17 U.S. attorneys' offices, onsite interviews with 90 criminal justice personnel in 6 Federal jurisdictions, examination of 546 cases, and analysis of FBI data on 700 robbery and embezzlement cases. In addition, a mail survey was conducted in all 94 U.S. attorneys' offices, and published court statistics were examined. A study group consisting of six jurisdictions (New Jersey, Colorado, northern California, southern Florida, southern New York, and northern Illinois) was used. A total of 97 percent of cases complied with the law's 30-day limit in the year ending June 30, 1983, the corresponding figure for the study group was 94 percent. The number of cases taking an extermely long time to disposition has declined in recent years. The law has also encouraged U.S. attorneys' offices and the courts to review their case management policies and procedures and to take steps to improve efficiency. However, the law appears to have had some unintended consequences. The Government appears to have partly responded by controlling case intake and by moving as much case preparation as possible outside the mandated intervals. Some confusion exists over the application of the excludable delay provisions. However, these consequences appear to be relatively minor. The Judicial Conference should update its guidelines to promote greater uniformity in the application of the excludable time provisions and other provisions of the Act. Local field offices, U.S. attorneys' offices, and individual courts should review their policies and procedures regularly to see that they conform to both the letter and the spirit of the law. Additional training is also needed to ensure that staff are familiar with the law's provisions and that no cases are dismissed due to oversight or misunderstanding of the law. Data tables and footnotes are supplied. (Author summary modified)
Index Term(s): Court case flow; Legislative impact; Right to speedy trial; Speedy Trial Act of 1974
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.