skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 98353 Find in a Library
Title: Damage to Property - Arson
Corporate Author: Law Reform Cmssn of Canada
Date Published: 1984
Page Count: 48
Sponsoring Agency: Law Reform Cmssn of Canada
Ottawa, Ontario K1A OL6, Canada
National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Sale Source: Law Reform Cmssn of Canada
130 Albert Street
Ottawa, Ontario K1A OL6,

National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF
Language: English; French
Country: Canada
Annotation: This report of Canada's Law Reform Commission reviews the legislative history and current law of arson in Canada, examines key issues in arson law, and recommends specific changes in arson law.
Abstract: A historical review of Canada's criminal law of arson indicates that it has not changed much since 1892, the inaugural date of Canada's first Criminal Code. Current arson law is complex and redundant; which offense is charged depends on the type of property burned and often on whether or not the perpetrator had fraudulent intent. Confusion about arson-related offenses leads to the rare use of some sections of the law and frequent failure in prosecution because the wrong offense was charged. Key issues in arson law are noted: the nature of the act proscribed, the mental element required, and the description of the property protected under the law. The commission offers five specific recommendations to change the current arson law: (1) that the arson offense prohibit conduct which causes a fire or explosion resulting in damage to or destruction of property, (2) that the mental element for the arson offense be intent or recklessness, (3) that the arson offense deal with damaging or destroying all corporeal property by fire or explosion regardless of the type of corporeal property involved, (4) that the arson offense protect only the property owned by someone other than the perpetrator, and (5) that the maximum penalty for arson be higher than the maximum penalty for the general offense of vandalism. A total of 110 notes are listed.
Index Term(s): Arson; Arson legislation; Canada; Commission reports; Law reform
Note: Working paper number 36, includes both English and French versions.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.