skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 98403 Find in a Library
Title: Alternatives to the Insanity Defense
Journal: Journal of Psychiatry and Law  Volume:12  Dated:(Spring 1984)  Pages:93-102
Author(s): R G LaGrone; D C Combs
Date Published: 1984
Page Count: 10
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The insanity defense, so named from the verdict of 'not guilty by reason of insanity' (NGRI), has been a source of empassioned debate since its inception.
Abstract: More recently, the NGRI controversy was renewed by the verdict of NGRI in the case of John Hinckley, Jr. This article examines various issues and alternatives to the insanity defense, i.e., 'guilty but mentally ill' (GBMI) and 'not responsible by reason of insanity' (NRRI), that are evolving in the public arena today. An argument favoring NRRI is presented.
Index Term(s): Guilty but mentally ill; Insanity defense
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.