skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 98459 Find in a Library
Title: Avoiding Legal Pitfalls in Investigations
Journal: Security Management  Volume:29  Issue:6  Dated:(June 1985)  Pages:24-30
Author(s): L F Hannon
Date Published: 1985
Page Count: 7
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article discusses some of the legal pitfalls to be avoided while conducting a private-sector investigation in order to protect the employer, not violate the law, or compromise a potential criminal investigation.
Abstract: Security managers use cameras, undercover agents, listening devices, polygraphs, and blood and urine tests in attempting to resolve security problems. However, they often disregard such legal considerations as entrapment, invasion of privacy, eavesdropping, and self-incrimination. Entrapment occurs when a law enforcement agent is involved in using persuasion or other means likely to cause law abiding persons to commit an offense. The right to privacy is an issue allowing evidence getting on the record in criminal cases as well as action for damages against employers in civil suits. Eavesdropping is an sense of the privacy question that has resulted in legislation. Self-incrimination allows individuals the right to remain silent and not testify against themselves in a criminal matter. A clear line differentiates between causing a person to commit a crime and setting a trap to to catch a person committing a crime. The author cautions security investigators to remember that courts require trickery not be used to induce a person to commit a crime. It is suggested that many legal obstacles bar the way to concluding a successful investigation. Familiarity with the law is essential, as is the use of common sense, and concern about the fair treatment of people. A case study is used for demonstration purposes.
Index Term(s): Criminal investigation; Legal deviance
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.