skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 98469 Find in a Library
Title: Legal and Ethical Issues in Mandatory Treatment - The Patient's Rights Versus Society's Rights (From Sexual Aggressor - Current Perspectives on Treatment, P 3-21, 1983, Joanne G Greer and Irving Stuart, ed. - See NCJ-98468)
Author(s): C Bohmer
Date Published: 1983
Page Count: 19
Sponsoring Agency: Van Nostrand Reinhold
New York, NY 10020
Sale Source: Van Nostrand Reinhold
135 West 50th Street
New York, NY 10020
United States of America
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This paper on mandatory treatment of sex offenders addresses such legal issues as informed consent, the right to refuse treatment, and offender rights under various treatment methods; the discussion of ethical issues focuses on the balancing of the rights of the patient with the rights of the treatment institution and society.
Abstract: A look at the legal issues involved in informed consent to treatment notes that listing the elements of informed consent poses no problem, but that the application of these elements to particular patients and situations is much more difficult. An analysis of the offender's right to refuse treatment examines this right as it applies to mental patients, inmates, and aggressive sexual offenders. Both legal and ethical issues in treating aggressive sexual offenders are reviewed including surgical treatment (castration and psychosurgery) and behavior modification techniques, primarily aversive techniques and token economies. Ethical issues involved in serving patient and institutional societal interests are categorized as (1) honesty in informing all parties about the interests and needs of others involved, (2) therapists' recognition of their superior power relative to their patients, and (3) therapists' confidentiality regarding their patients. The resolution or open recognition of these issues is recommended through treatment agreements between therapist and patient. Thirty-eight references are listed.
Index Term(s): Aversion therapy; Behavior modification; Involuntary treatment; Professional conduct and ethics; Psychosurgery; Right to refuse treatment; Right to treatment; Sex offenders
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.