skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 98479 Find in a Library
Title: Fourth Amendment Vagaries (Of Improbable Plain View, Notorious Privacy, and Balancing Askew)
Journal: Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology  Volume:74  Issue:4  Dated:(Winter 1983)  Pages:1171-1224
Author(s): W R LaFave
Date Published: 1983
Page Count: 54
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article critically evaluates nine search-and-seizure cases decided by the U.S. Supreme Court during the October 1982 term.
Abstract: The cases reviewed are Florida v. Royer, Texas v. Brown, United States v. Knotts, United States v. Place, Illinois v. Gates, Illinois v. Lafayette, Michigan v. Long, Unites States v. Vilamonte-Marquez, and Illinois v. Andreas. The evaluation of these decisions finds them to be troublesome in four areas: (1) what constitutes a justifiable expectation of privacy deserving of fourth amendment protection, (2) what quantum of evidence is required to establish probable cause for a search or seizure, (3) in what circumstances and manner should the balancing test (state versus privacy interests) be used to permit certain searches or seizures even without probable cause, and (4) when a container's contents are sufficiently apparent that a warrantless search would not jeopardize fourth amendment interests. The author believes that in all these areas the Court has been unduly generous in its definition of police power exercised in accord with fourth amendment protections. He also suggests that by the tenor and style of the decisions, a majority of the Court is seizing every available opportunity to expand the authority of law enforcement officials. A total of 284 footnotes are provided.
Index Term(s): Critiques; Probable cause; Search and seizure; Search warrants; US Supreme Court decisions
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=98479

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.