skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 98483 Find in a Library
Title: Fourth Amendment - Steering Away From Automobile Detention Precedents to Justify Warrantless Searches of Pleasure Boats in Inland Waters United States v Villamonte-Marquez, 103 S Ct 2573 (1983)
Journal: Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology  Volume:74  Issue:4  Dated:(Winter 1983)  Pages:1282-1299
Author(s): D L Bialosky
Date Published: 1983
Page Count: 18
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: In United States v. Villamonte-Marquez, the U.S. Supreme Court held that customs officials may board a vessel to inspect licensing documents, even if the vessel is located in waters providing ready access to open seas. This ruling is inconsistent with the Court's vehicle stop precedents. In the absence of an articulable suspicion of a law violation, pleasure boats should be detained only at fixed checkpoints.
Abstract: The Court distinguished its finding in Villamonte-Marquez from its most recent vehicle-stop precedent established in Delaware v. Prouse. In Prouse, the Court held that the fourth amendment prohibits police from stopping an automobile and detaining the driver to check his/her license and registration unless the officer has a reasonable suspicion of a law violation. In Villamonte-Marquez, the Court differentiated investigatory stops of vessels in waters offering ready access to the open sea from stops of automobiles on principal thoroughfares. First, the Court reasoned that permanent document checkpoints are not practical on waters where vessels can move in any direction at any time. Second, the Court indicated that documentation requirements applicable to vessels differ significantly from the system of auto licensing, and police officers patrolling highways can usually determine by observing a vehicle's license plate whether it is in compliance with State law; neither the Federal nor State Governments issue comparable license plates or stickers for vessels. Further, reasoned the Court, the statutes and regulations governing maritime documentation are more complex than the typical State requirements for vehicle licensing. The Court's decision is flawed in overstating the interests of the government in checking vessel documentation and in understating the privacy interests of vessel owners and operators. A total of 105 footnotes are provided.
Index Term(s): Customs violations; River and marine policing; Search and seizure; US Supreme Court decisions; Vehicle stops; Warrantless search
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.