skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 98544 Find in a Library
Title: New Process in Alabama Parole - Giving All Parties the Process Due (From Proceedings of the 29th Annual Southern Conference on Corrections, P 102-110, 1984 - See NCJ-98537)
Author(s): D L Schlotterback; W E Osterhoff
Date Published: 1984
Page Count: 9
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Recent Alabama legislation (1983) intended to curtail the use of parole by limiting the parole board's discretion to grant parole to serious felons and requiring elaborate notice procedures will lead to an increase in institutional populations and consequent Federal judicial releases without benefit of conditions, supervision, or input from interested groups.
Abstract: Alabama's 1983 revised parole statute removes the authority of the parole board to grant paroles to offenders who have committed specified serious felonies. Also, for all parole hearings, the following persons must be given notice of the time, date, and place of the meeting and the action to be considered; incumbent attorney general, the prosecuting district attorney, the chief of police in the jurisdiction of the crime, the sheriff of the county where the crime occurred, and the presiding judge. The law gives all the aforementioned parties the option to either appear before the board or give their views in writing. Both the administration and the function of the Board of Pardons and Paroles has suffered under the weight of the due notice and appearance requirements. Also, these inhibitions for parole will contribute to institutional crowding by prolonging the inevitable release of most offenders. In the past in Alabama, this has produced Federal judicial releases without conditions, supervision, or input from criminal justice professionals or other interested groups. Details of the revised statute are provided; seven references are listed.
Index Term(s): Alabama; Law reform; Legislative impact; Parole board discretion; Parolees rights; State laws
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.