skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 98557 Find in a Library
Title: Implications of Dispute Definitions (From Study of Barriers to the Use of Alternative Methods of Dispute Resolution, P 19-28, 1984 - See NCJ-97339)
Author(s): L Mather
Date Published: 1984
Page Count: 10
Sponsoring Agency: Vermont Law School
South Royalton, VT 05068
Sale Source: Vermont Law School
Dispute Resolution Project
South Royalton, VT 05068
United States of America
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The implications of how a dispute is defined for the disputants and by whom (third-party judge versus third-party mediator) are discussed with reference to criminal and civil cases.
Abstract: The greatest difference between a judge and a mediator is evident in the area of controlling the definition of a dispute. The judge can simply define the dispute as he/she sees it; whereas the mediator allows for greater participation by the disputants in the process of definition. An examination of criminal cases indicates that most are resolved through negotiation in lawyers' offices or judges' chambers, where issues of defining a case are resolved. In civil cases, such as consumer complaints and divorce, definition of the dispute may provide advantage to one or the other party. Another important issue in how cases are defined revolves around social norms and values implicit in the definition. For example, calling an incident a 'family fight' would divert it from the legal system, while categorizing it as 'domestic violence' implies that the case is not just a private family matter. When a case is given access to the legal system, it creates new legal norms that incorporates social values involved in individual disputes. In so doing, the political system is reinforced. Alternative processes, by privatizing disputes, may not publically address the political issues involved. The virtue of the court system is its public nature and its ability to address the social implications of a case. An appended discussion focuses on the lawyers' role in divorce case dispute definition.
Index Term(s): Alternative dispute settlement; Definitions; Divorce mediation; Judicial discretion; Mediation
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=98557

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.