skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 98561 Find in a Library
Title: Environmental Disputes - The Problem of Enforcing Negotiated Agreements (From Study of Barriers to the Use of Alternative Methods of Dispute Resolution, P 67-76, 1984 - See NCJ-97339)
Author(s): M A Wheeler
Date Published: 1984
Page Count: 10
Sponsoring Agency: Vermont Law School
South Royalton, VT 05068
Sale Source: Vermont Law School
Dispute Resolution Project
South Royalton, VT 05068
United States of America
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The article discusses noncompliance with negotiated solutions to environmental disputes within the context of specific cases and offers a typology of noncompliance.
Abstract: In one case involving the Environmental Protection Agnecy (EPA) and a paper company, an agreement was reached in which the company had to implement steps to mitigate a number of pollution problems before EPA would issue a permit for a less polluting, but also more cost-effective, boiler. In addition, the agreement was incorporated as part of a consent degree, thus expediting court enforcement in the event of noncompliance. In this case, a perceived compliance problem was solved. The structure of the agreement, not the terms themselves, encouraged the company to action. In a second case, a power company was concerned that stricter regulations in the future might render expensive pollution-control equipment obsolete. The problem was solved by making the agreement regulation-specific to the power facility, thereby making it more difficult for the Government to effect a revision at a later date. In another case, the specific dispute concerned a sewage treatment facility, but the real issue was growth control. In this case, no resolution was reached. In the final case, a dispute between a water board and environmentalists, an agreement to ensure adequate public participation in decisionmaking was reached. In negotiated agreements where there may be compliance problems, the negotiator should classify the problem in terms of deliberate noncompliance, unavoidable noncompliance, or unintentional noncompliance. Such a typology may aid in the assessment of incentives for noncompliance and how these might be restructured.
Index Term(s): Alternative dispute settlement; Conflict resolution; Environmental quality; Negotiation
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.