skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 98613 Find in a Library
Title: Effects of Scandal on Organizational Deviance - The Case of the FBI
Journal: Justice Quarterly  Volume:2  Issue:2  Dated:(June 1985)  Pages:237-258
Author(s): T G Poveda
Date Published: 1985
Page Count: 22
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study compares two major theoretical perspectives of organizational deviance in determining (1) how public disclosures and organizational power are related to organizational scandal and (2) the effect of an organizational scandal on organizational deviance; the focus of the study is the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) during 1950-83.
Abstract: One of the major theoretical perspectives of organizational deviance considered is the pluralist/ interactionist theory, which views organizational deviance as an institutionalized practice that has the active or passive support of the organization's dominant coalition. The second theoretical perspective considered is the political/economic elite view of organizational deviance, according to which organizational deviance is systemic and institutional rather than located in discrete organizational actors. One of the key study variables is public disclosure ('scandal'), which involves the revelation of embarassing or discrediting information about an organization. This variable was operationalized through news entries in the New York Times Index, 1950-82, which pertain to FBI deviance, corruption, or questionable practices. A second variable is organizational power, measured by the size of the FBI budget relative to that of the Department of Justice. A third variable used is organizational deviance. Since the majority of the FBI's questionable practices centered in domestic intelligence operations, these operations were used as an indirect indicator of organizational deviance. The final variable is scandal, which focused on the FBI's 'big scandal' of the 1970's, operationalized as beginning with the first public labeling of the FBI as a deviant organization on August 22, 1973, with the revelation of the burglary of Ellsberg's psychiatrist's office. The research used a quasi-experimental approach and a simple interrupted time-series design. Changes in the key variables were examined before and after the 'big scandal' to determine whether the pluralist or elite perspectives best explained changes in these variables as well as the intervention effects of the scandal. In identifying the importance of organizational power in managing disclosures that lead to scandal, the study supports the elite view of organizational deviance; however, neither major theoretical perspective is supported in the findings regarding the impact of scandal on organizational deviance. The study found that some aspects of organizational structure and process are more subject to change through scandal than other aspects. Graphic data and 44 references are provided.
Index Term(s): Corruption of public officials; Deviance; Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI); Organization studies; Organizational theories
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=98613

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.