skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 98775 Find in a Library
Title: French Jurisprudence on International Commercial Arbitration (From Resolving Transnational Disputes Through International Arbitration, P 146-183, 1984, Thomas E Carbonneau, ed. - See NCJ-98767
Author(s): T E Carbonneau
Date Published: 1984
Page Count: 38
Sponsoring Agency: University Press of Virginia
Charlottesville, VA 22903
Sale Source: University Press of Virginia
Box 3608
University Station
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States of America
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This summary and analysis of early and recent French court decisions pertaining to international commercial arbitration finds that the French courts have consistently encouraged arbitration to resolve disputes arising from the equivalent of international contracts.
Abstract: In early decisions, the French courts approached cases involving domestic and international commercial arbitration from distinctive doctrinal perspectives. Generally, they evidenced a more liberal and favorable attitude toward arbitration involving international commercial interests. In exclusively domestic cases, the courts showed greater reticence toward arbitration. In international disputes, however, the courts did not apply domestic law obstacles to arbitration. In contemporary litigation, this liberal judicial attitude toward international commercial arbitration has been maintained. Contemporary case law has made significant doctrinal advances, such as the courts' willingness to recognize the parties' intent to engage in arbitration. The chief innovation of contemporary case law, however, is the elaboration of the separability doctrine, which addresses the legal status of the arbitration clause as it relates to the principal contract. The French Supreme Court has ruled that an arbitration clause has an autonomous juridical character separate from the principal contract; consequently, its validity is not affected by the nullity of the principal contract. The paper provides English translations of seminal case opinions pertaining to French case law in international commercial arbitration. Sixty-two footnotes are provided.
Index Term(s): Arbitration rules; Commercial arbitration; France; International dispute settlement; Judicial decisions
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=98775

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.