skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 99042 Find in a Library
Title: Police, Privacy, and the Double-Standard (From Moral Issues in Police Work, P 277-288, 1985, Fredrick A Elliston and Michael Feldberg, ed. See NCJ-99027)
Author(s): F A Elliston
Date Published: 1985
Page Count: 12
Sponsoring Agency: Rowman and Allanheld Publishers
Totowa, NJ 07512
Sale Source: Rowman and Allanheld Publishers
Division of Littlefield, Adams and Co
81 Adams Drive
Totowa, NJ 07512
United States of America
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Police should not be administratively punished for personal or private actions that are not illegal.
Abstract: Some police administrators believe that police officers, because they are stewards of the public trust, should have their private lives scrutinized by a higher ethical or moral standard than is applied to citizens not having such a trust. Proponents of this double standard argue that police should be role models for others in all aspects of their lives. Proponents also reason that private vices and weaknesses can negatively impact officers' job performance. Police, however, are charged with enforcing the law and performing peacekeeping functions, not with being role models for particular moral principles. This is primarily the role of parents, teachers, and religious leaders. In their private lives, police officers should be law-abiding, but their professional responsibility in their private lives should not go beyond this requirement. Officers should not be reprimanded or discharged for off-duty conduct unless it is illegal or demonstrably undermines effective job performance. Sixteen notes are listed.
Index Term(s): Off-duty offenses; Off-duty police; Police policies and procedures; Police reprimands
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.