skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 99054 Find in a Library
Title: Florida's Sentencing Guidelines - Progression or Regression?
Journal: Federal Probation  Volume:49  Issue:1  Dated:(March 1985)  Pages:25-32
Author(s): D B Griswold
Date Published: 1985
Page Count: 8
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: After briefly describing the development of Florida's sentencing guidelines, this article critiques the method for developing the guidelines, sentencing factors and their weightings, and the implementation of the guidelines.
Abstract: Florida's statewide guidelines, completed in July 1983, are reflective of factors influencing past sentencing patterns. Rather than grouping offenses according to seriousness, nine categories of offenses were created based on the similarity of offenses in each category. Although the guidelines limit judicial discretion that can produce sentencing disparity, they essentially maintain the status quo of sentencing patterns. The rationale of the sentencing guidelines, although not explicitly stated, apparently is incapacitation, since offenders with lengthy criminal histories (regardless of the severity of the history) receive increasingly lengthy prison sentences. Uniformity in applying the guidelines is a problem due to the varying accuracy and completeness of the criminal records of those being sentenced. Further difficulties in uniformly applying the guidelines are likely to occur because of the structuring of the sentences. Overall, the guidelines do not promote sentencing offenders according to the severity of the instant offense; thus, they tend to enlarge the prison population with offenders who have lengthy criminal histories that may not be composed of serious crimes. The guidelines do not facilitate restricting imprisonment to serious offenders. Illustrative figures and 74 footnotes are provided.
Index Term(s): Critiques; Florida; Sentencing disparity; Sentencing guidelines; Sentencing reform
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.