skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 99065 Find in a Library
Title: Decision to Parole - Balancing the Rehabilitation of the Offender With the Protection of the Public
Journal: Journal of Criminology  Volume:27  Issue:3  Dated:(July 1985)  Pages:327-339
Author(s): I Shewan
Date Published: 1985
Page Count: 13
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: Canada
Annotation: This study traces the background of Canada's rehabilitative parole and mandatory supervision, reports on a statistical analysis of Canadian Federal parole results, and draws implications of the study findings for current parole policy.
Abstract: The paper's first section documents how parole was introduced in Canada to serve a rehabilitative function, followed by the establishment of a program of mandatory supervision to complement rehabilitative functions. The second section reports on a Type I/II error study that statistically analyzed the first 5 years (1971-75) that parole and mandatory supervision operated concurrently. Study results are assessed as of June 1, 1980. The Type I/II error categorization results from a statistical application of a primary theorem of elementary decision theory which holds that for any decision, there are two possible error types. In relation to parole decisions, these error types are defined as (1) paroling an inmate who subsequently has his parole revoked and (2) not paroling an inmate who subsequently completes mandatory supervision without revocation. The study establishes that Federal parole release results and mandatory supervision release results can be used in concert to produce valid statistical measurements of Type I and Type II errors respectively. The Type I/II error distinction is used to demonstrate that the concurrent operation of parole and mandatory supervision has produced a parole system that emphasizes public protection over offender rehabilitation. The final section of the paper explains why it is important for the parole board to reflect on the reasons why parole was instituted. The paper argues that the reasons for operating parole as a rehabilitative system are still relevant. Tabular data from the statistical study are supplied along with a list of 30 references.
Index Term(s): Canada; Parole; Parole outcome prediction; Probation or parole decisionmaking
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=99065

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.