skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 99089 Find in a Library
Title: Strategies of Diversion in European Juvenile Justice Systems (From Report for 1983 and Resource Material Series Number 25, P 81-93, 1984)
Author(s): G Kaiser
Date Published: 1984
Page Count: 13
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF
Language: English
Country: United Nations
Annotation: After an overview of trends in juvenile diversion programs in Europe, this paper notes distinctive characteristics of such programs in particular European countries and summarizes the advantages and criticisms of diversion programs.
Abstract: Over the last two decades, European countries have reduced the proportion of juvenile offenders undergoing formal juvenile justice processing due to the diversion of juvenile offenders who have committed petty crimes. Community service has been a major emphasis in these< diversion programs. On the other hand, there has been a recent trend toward greater punishment for specific types of juvenile offenders, particularly in England and France. Sweden emphasizes the individualized treatment of juveniles through dispositions by welfare boards, and Scotland has replaced juvenile courts with welfare committees composed of lay people. A major advantage of these diversion programs is the rapidity and informality of dispositions. They have been criticized, however, because of a general failure to evaluate their effectiveness or monitor their implementation. their effectiveness or monitor their implementation. Another claimed weakness is their emphasis on maintaining juveniles in their community surroundings even when they are debilitating. Inconsistency in criteria for diverting juveniles and inadequate due process procedures are other criticisms of diversion programs. Forty-three references are listed.
Index Term(s): England; Europe; Foreign juvenile justice systems; France; Germany; Juvenile court diversion; Netherlands; Scandinavia; Scotland
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=99089

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.