skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 99303 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: State v. Hackworth - Oregon Application of Miranda Warnings to Motor Vehicle Accidents
Journal: Willamette Law Review  Volume:21  Issue:1  Dated:(Winter 1985)  Pages:181-186
Author(s): W C Frymire
Date Published: 1985
Page Count: 6
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This commentary examines the holding of the Oregon Court of Appeals in State v. Hackworth, which addresses the need for a Miranda warning during a roadside interrogation by law enforcement officers.
Abstract: In this case, Hackworth was charged with and convicted of driving under the influence following police interrogation relating to a vehicular accident. Hackworth appealed the conviction, claiming that the trial court erred in not suppressing evidence obtained prior to the issuance of a Miranda warning on two grounds: that the officer had formed an initial subjective intent to arrest and that the roadside stop constituted a significant deprivation of freedom requiring a Miranda warning. In deciding the case, the court adopted the reasonable-person-in-defendant's-situation standard put forth by the U.S. Supreme Court in Berkemer v. McCarty. The Oregon court found that a reasonable person subject to roadside interrogation would not believe he was in custody or under restraints similar to a formal arrest. The court further held that the brevity and relatively noncoercive nature of a roadside stop did not constitute a deprivation of freedom sufficient to trigger a Miranda warning. Thus, in Oregon, under these circumstances, formal arrest will be the threshold for a Miranda warning. The defendant's conviction was affirmed. Included are 31 footnotes.
Index Term(s): Driving Under the Influence (DUI); Judicial decisions; Miranda rights; Oregon; State courts; Traffic law enforcement; US Supreme Court decisions; Vehicle stops
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.