skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 99335 Find in a Library
Title: Sentencing Policies and Practices in the USA
Journal: UNAFEI Resource Material Series  Issue:26  Dated:(December 1984)  Pages:108-124
Author(s): A J Reiss
Date Published: 1984
Page Count: 17
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United Nations
Annotation: The development of the just deserts model in sentencing is discussed, with emphasis on the sentencing models used in Minnesota and Pennsylvania and on the concept of selective incapacitation.
Abstract: The just deserts model rests on retributive principles but assumes proportionality in assigning punishments. The resulting sentencing models that have been adopted seek to reduce the judicial discretion involved in strict proportionality and to avoid sentencing disparity. Minnesota, the first State to develop sentencing guidelines based on a just deserts model, modified the model by considering the offender's prior record and by constraining sentence lengths to avoid prison overcrowding in accordance with a legislative mandate that no new prisons be built. All but 1 percent of current sentences are within the resulting guidelines. Pennsylvania's guidelines, developed independently of prison capacity considerations, rest on two factors: offense seriousness and prior record. The system appears to be succeeding in reducing both sentencing disparity and undue leniency, but prison overcrowding has not been controlled. These two systems show the potential of sentencing guidelines for controlling prison overcrowding and the need for central coordination. Figures, tables, and 23 references are supplied.
Index Term(s): Determinate Sentencing; Indeterminate sentences; Just deserts theory; Minnesota; Pennsylvania; Selective incapacitation; Sentencing guidelines; Sentencing reform
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=99335

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.