skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 99384 Find in a Library
Title: Review Essay - Public Decisions and Private Rights
Journal: Criminal Justice Ethics  Volume:3  Issue:2  Dated:(Summer/Fall 1984)  Pages:50-62
Author(s): R E Barnett
Date Published: 1984
Page Count: 12
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: After summarizing John Kaplan's theses concerning heroin use, drug law enforcement, and public policy, this review examines the utility of public policy versus individual rights approaches to legal decisionmaking.
Abstract: In his book, Kaplan demolishes myths surrounding heroin use that inform efforts to combat it. He shows that heroin use is not always addictive, continuous, or permanent and that the relationship between addiction and predatory crime is not so great as has been thought and is, in part, the result of conditions related to the illegality of its use. Despite Kaplan's acknowledgement of the disasterous consequences of the legal prohibition on the sale and use of heroin, he does not advocate its decriminalization. In defending prohibitions on heroin use, Kaplan uses a pragmatic public policy approach that contends that the lowering of social productivity associated with heroin use would impose greater social costs than do efforts to suppress drug use. The classical liberal view concerning what conduct should be legally proscribed holds that, in the absence of harm (defined as physical interference with the property rights of others) to others, individuals should be allowed the discretion to apply standards and choose among alternatives, even if their choices are later regretted by themselves or others. While Kaplan attempts to rebut a rights approach to policy analysis as mere assertion, it is a method of decisionmaking with discernible characteristics superior to any other. The complexity of social life makes public (utilitarian) policy analysis inherently impractical. This complexity requires the decentralized decisionmaking process that an individual rights approach provides. Such an approach recognizes that the nature of human beings requires that they be accorded the final say on their own life-paths. Because a private rights approach is more practical than an analysis of social costs and benefits, it is also a better theory of justice. Included are 11 footnotes.
Index Term(s): Constitutional Rights/Civil Liberties; Cost/Benefit Analysis; Critiques; Decriminalization; Drug abuse; Drug law enforcement; Drug Related Crime; Heroin; Literature reviews; Policy analysis; Social control
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=99384

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.