skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 99536 Find in a Library
Title: Federal Grand Jury Subpoenas to Attorneys - A Proposal for Reform
Journal: American Criminal Law Review  Volume:23  Issue:1  Dated:(Summer 1983)  Pages:95-133
Author(s): R N Weiner
Date Published: 1985
Page Count: 39
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: After examining the pros and cons of issuing grand jury subpoenas to attorneys for testimony and documents concerning their clients, this article considers the manner in which courts have balanced or failed to balance the competing values at stake, followed by a proposal for administrative action to protect the attorney-client relationship.
Abstract: A grand jury subpoena to an attorney for testimony or documents concerning a client chills the flow of information between lawyer and client essential to a criminal defense. In some cases, this would produce a conflict of interest that warrants the termination of representation. In other cases, the subpoena may be designed to intimidate the attorney, induce cooperation with the government, or deter the assertion of particular defenses. On the other hand, the government has significant interests in issuing such subpoenas, since attorneys are often a useful source of information on clients targeted in grand jury inquiries. Attorneys may also be under investigation for their own misconduct. In various circumstances, attorney testimony or records may be essential to the grand jury's inquiry. To balance the interests involved, the U.S. Justice Department should issue guidelines. First, the guidelines should provide that an attorney will not be subpoenaed if the information is available from another source. Second, it should be shown that the information sought from the attorney is necessary for a legitimate investigative purpose. Third, the subpoena should be authorized by the Attorney General or a designate. Fourth, a subpoena should be limited to materials or testimony required for the investigation. Finally, any theory of waiver for the attorney-client privilege should be cleared through the specified approval process. A total of 233 footnotes are provided.
Index Term(s): Attorney client relations; Grand juries; Grand jury reform; Privileged communications; Subpoenas
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.