skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 99565 Find in a Library
Title: Sociobiological Hypotheses About Rape - A Critical Look at the Data Behind the Hypotheses (From Violence Against Women - A Critique of the Sociobiology of Rape, P 23-58, 1985, Suzanne R Sunday and Ethel Tobach, eds. See NCJ-99563)
Author(s): C F Harding
Date Published: 1985
Page Count: 36
Sponsoring Agency: Gordian Press, Inc.
Staten Island, NY 10304
Sale Source: Gordian Press, Inc.
85 Tompkins Street
P.O. Box 304
Staten Island, NY 10304
United States of America
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This chapter critiques sociobiological hypotheses that explain rape behavior in human populations.
Abstract: Some sociobiologists who have examined rape behavior from an evolutionary perspective hypothesize that it is adaptive behavior designed to increase the reproductive fruitfulness of the rapist, who has been frustrated or thwarted in attempts to obtain consensual sexual relations. This theory has been developed from an analysis of animal behaviors. Vaious flaws exist, however, in drawing parallels between animal and human behavior concerning rape. First, applying anthropomorphic terms such as rape to nonhuman animals is imprecise and incorrectly implies a similarity of form, function, and proximate cause between human and animal behavior which has not been documented. Further, such an analysis implies that scientists can unequivocally determine when a nonhuman animal copulation is forced or resisted. Also, sociobiologists' use of the term rape is usually different from either common usage or the legal and scientific definitions used in human studies. Sociobiologists tend to redefine terms so as to produce circular reasoning, e.g., restricting rape only to sexual assaults logically expected by the rapist to produce offspring. Two other aspects of sociobiological rape hypotheses cannot be empirically supported: (1) humans have been strongly selected to maximize their reproduction and exhibit kin selection and (2) rape behavior persists because rapists enjoy a reproductive advantage over nonrapists. Finally, sociobiological reasoning about rape contains obvious sexual and cultural biases. Sixty-one references are listed.
Index Term(s): Definitions; Genetic influences on behavior; Rape; Rapists
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=99565

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.